Get this delivered to your inbox
Real problems, practical fixes for leaders of international teams. Published weekly.
✓ You’re subscribed. Check your inbox to confirm.
The short answer: Some cultures make decisions by consensus: everyone is consulted, the decision takes longer, and it holds once it is made. This is common in countries such as Japan, Sweden and the Netherlands. Others decide top-down: a senior person decides quickly and expects immediate action, as is common in the United States, China and France. When the two meet in one team, one side feels the decision was rushed and the other feels it never gets made. The fix is to agree in advance which decisions are made which way, and to say how a decision will be made before the discussion starts.
Consensual vs Top-down decision making. The Decision-making process can vary significantly across cultures, with some favouring a consensual approach and others a top-down method. Understanding these differences is essential for effective cross-cultural collaboration. This post will explore the concepts of consensual and top-down decision-making, provide examples of the differences, discuss issues that arise when these cultures meet, and offer practical steps for organisations to facilitate better decision-making processes.

Understanding Consensual vs. Top-Down Decision-Making
Consensual Decision-Making:
- Decisions are made collectively, with input from all team members.
- Common in cultures such as Japan, Sweden, and the Netherlands.
- Emphasizes collaboration, discussion, and mutual agreement.
Top-Down Decision-Making:
- Decisions are made by individuals at the top of the hierarchy.
- Common in cultures such as the United States, China, and France.
- Emphasizes authority, efficiency, and clear directives.
Example: In a consensual culture, a decision might be reached only after extensive discussion and agreement from all team members. In a top-down culture, a senior leader might make a decision quickly and expect immediate implementation without much discussion.
Practical Steps for Organizations
- Decision-Making Training:
- Provide training that highlights the differences between consensual and top-down decision-making styles.
- Use role-playing exercises to help employees practice adapting to different decision-making processes.
- Developing Flexible Decision-Making Policies:
- Create policies that accommodate both consensual and top-down preferences.
- Ensure that decision-making processes are clear and communicated to all team members.
- Facilitating Cross-Cultural Understanding:
- Encourage open discussions about decision-making preferences and cultural norms.
- Implement regular meetings where team members can share their experiences and expectations regarding decision-making.
- Scenario:
- An international team with members from Japan and the United States faces challenges in decision-making. Japanese team members expect thorough discussions and consensus before making decisions, while American team members prefer quick, decisive actions from leaders.
- To address this, the organization implements a hybrid approach. They designate specific types of decisions for consensual processes (e.g., strategic planning) and others for top-down processes (e.g., urgent operational matters). Cross-cultural training sessions help team members understand and respect each other’s decision-making styles.
Summary and Key Points
- Understanding Decision-Making Styles: Recognize the difference between consensual and top-down decision-making.
- Effective Training: Provide training to help staff navigate different decision-making styles.
- Flexible Policies: Develop decision-making policies that accommodate both consensual and top-down preferences.
- Facilitating Understanding: Encourage open discussions about decision-making expectations.
Advice for Staff:
- When involved in decision-making with colleagues from different cultural backgrounds, be aware of their preferences for consensual or top-down processes.
- Adapt your approach to decision-making to accommodate both styles, seeking a balance between collaboration and efficiency.
- Foster mutual respect and understanding to create a harmonious and productive decision-making environment.
By understanding and adapting to different decision-making styles, professionals can enhance cross-cultural collaboration, improve team dynamics, and create a more inclusive workplace.
I have written a number of posts in this series which you can find here
1 – Reading Between the Lines – Low-context and High-context Communication
2 – Navigating Feedback Across Cultures
3 – Persuading Across Cultures – Principles First vs. Applications First
4 – Leadership and Hierarchy – Navigating Egalitarian and Hierarchical Cultures
If you would like a deeper overview of this topic, you can read our full guide on Cross Cultural Communication in Teams.
You can also get a copy of the book by Erin Meyer “The culture Map” which discusses many of the cultural aspects that we are looking at in this series of posts.
Get notified when new articles are published
Is this happening in your team?
If cultural friction is slowing down your international team, let’s spend 30 minutes looking at what’s actually going on. No pitch — just a conversation.
Book a discovery call View workshopsQuestions leaders ask about consensual vs top-down decision-making
What is the difference between consensual and top-down decision-making?
In consensual decision-making, decisions are made collectively after discussion and agreement from the team. In top-down decision-making, a person at the top of the hierarchy decides and expects the team to implement the decision quickly.
Why do decisions keep getting reopened in international teams?
Often because people have different expectations about how the decision is made. Team members used to consensus may not see a quick top-down call as a final decision, while those used to top-down decisions read continued discussion as indecision or resistance.
How should a mixed team make decisions?
Agree which types of decisions are consensual, such as strategic planning, and which are top-down, such as urgent operational matters. Before each discussion, say how the decision will be made and who makes the final call, and then confirm the decision in writing.
The BASIS Leadership Programme · Level 2
Work on this with your own team in Level 2, session 3: Decisions and buy-in
One-to-one leadership and management training for managers of multicultural and international teams. You leave this session with a decision rule card and a staged process for big decisions — built around your real team.
Level 2: managing multicultural teams → The leadership programme for multicultural teamsListen & Subscribe
Cultural Friction is now a podcast
The same real problems and practical fixes for leaders of international teams — now in your ears. Follow the show wherever you listen.


